June 2008 Archives
Blog entries from early May ("Just Fiddlin...?" and "Just Fiddlin...? (Part 2)") painted a picture of the extent of unresolved policy issues in Canadian agriculture. As we indicated in those earlier entries we would post follow-up blog entries to estimate the costs of having improperly aligned policy. This entry is the second follow-up entry. In this entry we provide a rough cost estimate of the widened canola basis in the commodity market. The estimates that we provide are by no means a complete costing of the issues; in fact we encourage comments on our assumptions and alternative ways to valuate the policy issues.
Preliminary estimates show
that the costs of an erratic canola basis could be in the range of $100 in a
one-time loss to an annual $400 million loss (see Table 1). This cost is one
that is borne entirely by farmers (as the entry from two weeks ago indicated
(link), the costs associated with transportation problems are split between
farmers and other system players).
Policy
development is an intensive process of "research, analysis, consultation and
synthesis of information to produce recommendations" for direction or specific
action on an issue (MB Office of
Auditor General 2003). It can take months and even years to develop policy.
Bringing the right people into the process often means bringing in people with
already stretched time resources, which can limit the timeliness of policy
development. Are there ways to speed up the process and be more accommodating
to the heavy workloads of individuals?
