Current grain prices are
bringing genuine smiles to the face of many a Prairie grain producer. It is
good to see grain farmers with such optimism. They have faced a number of
financially difficult years and now they have some good prospects. How long
this will last, no one knows. If you had a chance to examine last week's
Many
Prairie grain farmers have received substantial government transfers in
previous years. I was one who argued that the government should support grain
farmers, an argument not appreciated in all quarters. Hopefully the industry
will evaluate what impact, good and bad, the past transfers had on the grains
sector.
While the grains sector is experiencing good times financially it is important to address the secondary challenges that come about as grain prices rise. Keeping these effects in mind may help the agriculture industry make the most of the current opportunity. Some of the secondary challenges are local, some national, and some international.
At least two interesting
challenges will occur at the local level. First, there is likely to be an
impact on land prices. As grain prices rise, land prices and rental rates will be bid up. Grain prices, however, are not the sole determinant of farm profits. The cost of production is also
increasing, which will push farm profits down. Farmers need to be mindful of
what the net returns will be over the longer term and how much they can afford
to bid for land. Second, the livestock and ethanol sectors are going to be
adversely affected. Both hog and beef producers will see some very lean years.
We expect these sectors to shrink in size as some producers go out of business,
with few, if any, new entrants. The ethanol industry, which is just emerging
with considerable encouragement from governments and industry leaders, will
also be adversely affected. An interesting policy question is whether we should
just let these industries take a financial hit after encouraging them so
strongly? Should these sectors be provided with assistance today to ensure that
they are still present when grain prices again fall?
At
the national level the federal government will appreciate not having to contend
with grain farmers asking for financial assistance. Farm income support
programs will now be used to reduce the financial stress of livestock
producers. Hopefully the provincial and federal support will be sufficient and quickly administered to help these producers. Crop insurance can be expected to be under significant pressure. With a
doubling of crop prices, the liability of crop insurance will increase and this
could place financial pressure on a province like Saskatchewan should we have a
large number of claims due to drought or frost. Saskatchewan has a very large
crop insurance program with a liability of approximately 2 billion dollars (all
crops, forages, etc.) in 2007 that may rise to 3 billion dollars for the 2008
crop (depending on various factors such as farmer participation rates). An
additional national issue is the price of food. The current high dollar has
restrained the increase in food prices; however, governments will be watching
food prices with interest. Expect to hear more about increases in food prices
in the future.
At
the international level the issue is what to do with the world trade talks.
Most of the coupled subsidies in the United States and Europe will not be in
effect under the current price scenario. Decoupled payments like the single payment scheme in Europe will continue to pay grain producers a per acreage payment. However, the question is how will governments view the high price of farm products and the resulting rise in food costs? Will they see this
as an opportunity to dump a number of the farm protection policies, arguing
they are no longer needed? Or will they see the high prices as a food security
threat and argue to retain or even increase the support for agricultural
production? Both arguments are currently in the media.
These are interesting times. Agriculture and food are sensitive issues for many countries, including Canada - that has not changed.
This blog entry was authored by Hartley Furtan, a professor in the Department of Bioresources Policy, Business and Economics at the U of S. To read additional Illative Blog entries or to leave comments on this entry, please visit www.illativeblog.ca. The Illative Blog is an initiative by the Knowledge Impact in Society (KIS) Project based out of the University of Saskatchewan. Email correspondence can be sent to kis.project@usask.ca

All very well reasoned. Should the support of the livestock industries be in cash, and risk retaliation by US, or are loans the more appropriate?
Much talk of rising prices, with little discussion of rising input costs. Increase in rental and land prices was mentioned in the above - but only briefly. But with escalating fuel and fertilizer costs (the biggies) and with rising machinery costs - will farm income really increase - Net Income that is. Or will we still see some need for assistance.
And if it was possible to factor in the true 'opportunity cost' of owned land - then true net income would suffer with the pressure on land prices.
thoughts for debate . ..
Jack Zenert