January 2008 Archives
Current grain prices are
bringing genuine smiles to the face of many a Prairie grain producer. It is
good to see grain farmers with such optimism. They have faced a number of
financially difficult years and now they have some good prospects. How long
this will last, no one knows. If you had a chance to examine last week's
Many
Prairie grain farmers have received substantial government transfers in
previous years. I was one who argued that the government should support grain
farmers, an argument not appreciated in all quarters. Hopefully the industry
will evaluate what impact, good and bad, the past transfers had on the grains
sector.
While the grains sector is experiencing good times financially it is important to address the secondary challenges that come about as grain prices rise. Keeping these effects in mind may help the agriculture industry make the most of the current opportunity. Some of the secondary challenges are local, some national, and some international.
As we move into a new year, the question "What does the future hold?" is on many people's minds. The general optimism exhibited at the Crop Production Week in Saskatoon last week (January 5-12, 2008) provides one indication of what people in the agricultural sector are expecting. Industry analysts, who typically share the optimism of farmers and input suppliers, talk about a new paradigm and predict that high grain and oilseed prices can be expected for at least two years. Some suggest, like the Economist magazine in their December 6, 2007 article Food Prices: Cheap No More, that commodity prices could remain strong for as long as 10 years.
While it is important to try and predict what the future will hold, it is also necessary to do something else, particularly, perhaps, in a period when times are good. Specifically, it is incumbent upon everyone to think about what the future should bring, rather than what it could bring.
General
farm organizations in Saskatchewan have had a colourful, and in some instances
coloured, past. They have followed some interesting patterns - often
established in the face of poor economic circumstances, their membership
structure based loosely on some past organization's structure, and (most
importantly) governed by, and only by, producers themselves. Ultimately, the
demise of these organizations has also followed similar patterns - dilution of
their focus or objectives and declining membership to the point of insolvency.
